Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Constituency:
Parliament:
Alan Simpson,
Alan Simpson,
Vernon House,
House Of
18 Friar Lane,
Commons,
Nottingham,
London.
NG1 6DQ.
SW1 OAA
0115 9560 460
Index Articles Parliament Media
index Articles Archive In Parliament Media
Press EDM's Surgeries Constituency
In The Press Early Day Motions Advice Surgeries Constituency
Eco House Quotes Gallery Biography
Eco House Quotes Gallery Biography

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player


Index > QUOTES (updated 01/01/10)
SEARCH SITE:


QUOTES

£1 per Mile
Action Aid
Afghanistan
AntiSocial Behaviour
Asylum Seekers
Autism Bill
Biotechnology
Cannabis
Coroners & Justice
Democracy
EU
EU Rebate
Food Supplements
Sir Fred Goodwin
Gambling Bill
GM Crops
Gurkhas
Heathrow
ID Cards
Immigration
Immigration Jobs
Iraq
Junk Food Tax
London Bombings
NHS
Parking Levy
Parliament
Pension Provision
Planning Paper
Police
Sexual Orientation
Single Currency
Smoking Ban
Socialism
Third Way
Voting Age
WTO






Quotes

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT'S £1 PER MILE
I have deep reservations about road pricing in whatever form it takes. The £1 per mile charge would be simply a means by which the rich priced the poor off the road. We are going to have to make big changes in our transport assumptions for the 21 st Century. This means investing in public transport before you start to penalise everything else.

back to top



ACTION AID CAMPAIGN
The HIV/AIDS epidemic is a terrible human catastrophe and its impact on social and economic development in Africa in particular is reversing the development gains of the past, at a time when 46% of Africa 's people are living in extreme poverty.

There is a simple solution to this very complex and globally diverse epidemic. Condoms or drugs alone are not the answer to tackling HIV/AIDS. The fight against HIV/AIDS also has to include effective public health programmes to be implemented successfully, they need to involve government, education, health, agriculture, civil society and the private sector, and this is the approach the UK promotes.

Most of the Department for International Development (DFID)'s HIV/AIDS spending goes direct to developing countries, through Government, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) or the private sector. Last year we invested over £250 million on HIV/AIDS related bilateral work. We are committed to increasing our activities and spending over the next five years. We also provide significant contributions to supporting the HIV/AIDS programmes of multilateral agencies, including the United Nations. The UK has played a leading role in setting up the Global Fund to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria and want to play our part in making it an effective instrument in the fight against AIDS, TB and Malaria. We recognise that to do this, it needs predictable and sustainable financing. The Global Fund conference held in Paris earlier this year provided a good opportunity to increase and widen the partnership base and showed Europe 's commitment to the GFATM.

The EU contribution now represents 55% of the total commitment to the GFATM. The UK has pledged an additional US$80 million to the GFATM (US$40 million over a further two years). This will extend our current commitment to 2008, bringing our total contribution to the Global Fund to US$280 million. I won't pretend that this is a magic answer to the problems posed by the issues of AIDS, TB and Malaria. What I hope you accept is that it is an important step towards meeting this challenge.

back to top


ON THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN AND TERRORISM
Click here to link to Alan's page on The war in Afghanistan and Terrorism.

back to top


ANTI SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
Labour has introduced ASBO's (anti social behaviour orders) along with parenting orders and tougher powers for both the police and the local authorities. In Nottingham this has been backed by the appointment of 75 new neighbourhood wardens and 90 patch managers. It is at the level of small scale, but seriously disrupting behaviour that we are focusing labour's campaign to build safer communities.

back to top


ASYLUM SEEKERS
There are two critical things we should do in relation to asylum. The first is to cease supporting wars that force people to flee for their lives. The second is to give asylum seekers the right to contribute in our society even while there case is being considered.

Today, we make it illegal for a refugee to work, but require them to survive on benefits that are 30% below subsistence levels. This invites people to be part of the illicit society that exploits and abuses everyone it touches.

The best way of speeding up asylum applications is to increase the staff available to process them.

back to top


AUTISM BILL
(Private Members Bill put forward by Cheryl Gillan MP).
Unfortunately I am unable to be there for the Second Reading as I already have commitments in my Constituency on Friday 27th February, but I would be astonished if anyone was going to oppose the Bill at this stage.  It will then go into its committee stage where all of the detailed examination of the clauses in the Bill takes place. 

After that, the Bill will come back to the Commons and I would confidently expect to support it when it does.  My only cautionary word of warning is this: it is extremely easy for even one Member of Parliament to scupper a Private Members Bill.  They can talk it out, bury it in hundreds of amendments or even talk out the Bill that comes before it so that your own Bill never gets reached.

I am not saying it will happen in this case. But having seen it happen before, I now approach such Bills with a large degree of caution.  Fingers crossed.

back to top


BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTING & GM CROPS
'This is a crook's charter. It has nothing to do with how we feed the planet and everything to do with who owns the food chain. Corporations will use this to recolonise the planet; conquest by the patent rather than the sword'.

back to top


ON CANNABIS
'What is the point of criminalizing half of society and almost the entirety of MS sufferers? I can't stand smoking, but that's no reason to make it an imprisonable offence. We should subject cannabis to the same regulatory rules applying to alcohol and tobacco. For other drugs, we should be looking to separate dependency from criminality, offering treatment and support for addicts, with out cornering them into lifestyles of crime or prostitution'

back to top


CORONERS AND JUSTICE BILL
There are parts of this Bill I will continually be taking issue with, but the time to do so will be when the Bill has completed its Committee Stage and come back to the House of Commons for Report.

I will almost certainly be voting against any proposals to allow coroners hearings to be held in secret if the Secretary of State believes there are ‘national interest’ matters at state.  The Coroner is the public Coroner not the state Coroner.  Current proposals to allow the Government to remove the Coroner and replace them with a nominated judge, risks removing from the public what maybe their last remaining right to have a clear account of how and why someone died.

The Government was keen to use such a power to prevent the Coroner from obtaining film footage of British soldiers killed by American troops in the Middle East by ‘friendly fire’.  It is not the job of the Coroner to defend the British state (or any friendly) overseas interests.  The Coroners job is to protect the public and that is what I will be voting to retain.

I also have reservations about the wording of Clause 58.  A line does have to be drawn between freedom of speech and incitement to violence.  In principle, I do not believe that particular religions should either be protected from criticism or prevented from criticising.  It is only when you move into incitement to violence or the removal of rights from others, where is a case for prosecutable offences.  I tend to agree with Liberty that there is a case for a wholesale review of freedom of speech offences.  I hope that this is taken into account during the Committee Stage of the Bill and that what comes back is more meaningful and balanced.

back to top


DEMOCRACY
'The big struggle of the 21st Century will be between citizens and corporations. If political parties do not take their citizen's side, we will find ourselves thrown into an era of corporate feudalism. Then you can forget democracy, forget equity, forget sustainability, and forget anything that might address climate change. For all of the personal shortcomings we bring to it, a vigorous democracy is still the best imperfection we have'.

back to top


EU REBATE
On the subject of the Euro, I do not think we will ever join it and I will certainly campaign against doing so. On the subject of the rebate, I do not mind us looking again at this if the EU agrees first to look at the unfairness of the budget itself. If Britain got a fair share of the budget in the first place we wouldn't need a rebate to put it right. I think this is going to be an area of considerable debate over the coming months and I certainly intend to play my part in it.

back to top


FOOD SUPPLEMENTS
I have campaigned against the EU Directive and the particularly hard-line interpretation of it that is being pursued by the British Government. This has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the public; instead it is all about protecting the profits of the pharmaceutical industries.

back to top


SIR FRED GOODWIN
At a time when we have yet to restore the value of the state pension, I can well understand the anger of those who find it difficult to see how Sir Fred is going to struggle on almost £700,000 a year that he has happily pocketed. 

I have spent many years campaigning for the people who have had their pensions stolen within ‘collapsed’ pension schemes. It took several years and about the same number of court judgments to get the Government to step in with a practical rescue scheme.   Given that Sir Fred has been able to collapse not just a single pension scheme, but a large part of the banking system, he obviously considers he is worth more than this.

My view is that we may be wasting our time chasing the legality or otherwise of the pension.  There may be another simpler way of getting the money back.  Why don’t we just sue him for negligence and damage?  If you had a builder whose work resulted in the complete collapse of your property you wouldn't’t be asking what pension he was on.  You would sue. If that meant that the money had to be recouped from the builders own properties, savings and assets, so be it.  That is what we should be doing with Sir Fred.  It may not be legitimate to seek to recoup the entire £25 billion from him, but as reasonable people I am sure that you and I could agree on a compromise figure.

There is also the little matter of the 7 board members of RBS bank, who put their hands up and voted for Sir Fred’s little nest egg.  If you or I had taken the works payroll and put it unsuccessfully on the 2.45pm at Chepstow, we would not expect to be given a £700,000 pension by way of compensation.  This would be an instant dismissal offence, with no compensation even contemplated.  It would bring a sobering message around boardrooms of banking or finance if these 7 members were sacked on the spot.  They and everyone else, need to understand that those who vote each other such ludicrous rewards for failure, will themselves face the chop.  I doubt that ‘dead men walking’ would then be so generous.  I hope this doesn’t sound too soft and woolly.

back to top


GAMBLING BILL
You may be aware that I am one of the leading voices in opposition to the proposal that would allow for the development of Super Casino's in Britain .

On the second reading of the Bill in Parliament, I decided to abstain, the reason for this quite simple. Nine tenths of the Bill involves an updating of existing laws and regulations that govern the industry. Most of these are uncontroversial and offer additional welcome protections for the public. The one part of the Bill that stands in glowing contrast is the part relating to Super Casino's. I believe this was only included at the behest of the owners of large casino's, largely from the USA . Labour has no manifesto commitment to introduce Super Casino's and there is no public demand for them. I have made it clear in writing to government whips that I will be voting against any such clauses when the Bill gets considered in any great detail.

For the record I also want to warn people against the compromise that may be offered of a limited number of pilot schemes (i.e. one per region). Under existing World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules, you cannot set up a closed market. You can have a market that allows for limited gambling with defined prize levels, but as soon as you allow one company to offer unlimited prizes it becomes illegal to prevent any number of others setting up within the same market. This is why I am arguing for an outright ban.

There is abundant evidence of the damage this does in terms of the increase in ‘problem gambling'. In Australia the estimate is that a billion pounds is gambled, but that the consequent costs of dealing with gambling addiction comes to 5 times that amount. Does Britain need this? No.

back to top


GM CROPS
I have been involved in the lobbying over this for many years and agree with the Campaign entirely. I went with Friends of the earth to make this point at a European lobby of the European Commission in Brussels .

Furthermore, I have signed up to the Green Gloves pledge, to remove GM crops where they are planted if the contamination threshold is above the 0.1% and if a GM ‘liability' scheme is not in place.

I will choose where and when to break the law in this way, but hope to see you and other supporters involved in this as a mass protest. Best wishes.

back to top


GURKHAS
This is a disgraceful state of affairs. They have served in conflicts throughout the world and are operating in Iraq and continue to serve with great distinction in Afghanistan.

In 2004 the immigration rules were changed to include post-1997 retired Gurkhas.  Fundamentally the issue now revolves around the 2,000 or so Gurkha’s who came to Britain pre 1997.  I can see no particular logic in having a time divide on this matter.  These are debts of honour and we should meet them.  It’s as simple as that.  This has been the position I have taken up for many years and one I will continue to argue for.

back to top


HEATHROW
The decision on Heathrow Airport is ludicrous.  The third runway is really a runway to the end of the earth.  We would have to install 7.2 million solar roofs to offset the carbon emissions from the extra air traffic, this runway will generate each year.  It makes a mockery of our climate change commitments by pretending that carbon savings can be made elsewhere in the economy, but without saying where. 

This is not a NIMBY issue affecting only those in the immediate vicinity of Heathrow.  If the public had been told that for this to be carbon neutral everyone would be banned from using their cars for nine months of the year.  There would have been a national outcry.  We cannot go on in a ‘Never Never Land’ world of politics, where the climate damage of what we do never has to be accounted for.  This is why I opposed the Heathrow expansion and will continue to do so.

back to top


ID CARDS
I know the cost of ID cards is likely to be astronomical, but this wasn't the main reason I voted against the Bill. Britain is the only country in the whole of Europe proposing to bring in ID cards that would give the state control over the data rather than the individual. It is a deeply regressive move. In other countries citizens have control over the data on their cards and national agencies cannot search through them from one information category to another to pry into peoples lives.

The most frightening point is that there are to be thousands of access points for information into the ID system. This is the route that hackers would use to break into the data banks and steal or tamper with information. It could take us into a whole new era of Identity fraud. This measure has nothing to do with personal security and everything to do with state surveillance.

back to top


IMMIGRATION
Britain cannot survive as a siege society. We need new people as young workers in the economy. With an ageing population we need this if today's and tomorrow's tax and NI contributions are to meet today's and tomorrow's pension needs. Of course we need an immigration system with clear and fair rules. It just needs to be run on a basis that avoids the racism or prejudice of the far right would seek to turn into a social panic.

back to top


IRAQ
Iraq was an illegal and immoral war that is ultimately un-winnable. Britain must set a date for the withdrawal of troops as other countries have done. I voted against this war on every possible occasion and will continue to do so.

back to top


JUNK FOOD TAXATION
I think the point I was trying to make about junk food is that we end up providing hidden subsidies for food processing that work counter to the nations health interests.  In the distant past Britain has had taxes on salt and on sugar.  Admittedly these taxes has nothing to do with health, they were mainly brought in as ways of raising revenue by taxing goods with a relatively in elastic demand.  I wanted to apply the same principle but for different purposes.

So far, the Government has been reluctant to go beyond the notion of a voluntary code drawn up by food manufacturers and supermarkets.  This gets reflected in ‘traffic light’ coding on products.  It does, however, still leave the onus on the individual.  It would, not be difficult to set percentage thresholds for salt content, sugar and saturated fats.  Beyond such thresholds you would face a higher rate of tax on the product itself.  It isn’t rocket science, merely a way of putting pricing policy and health policy on the same footing.

back to top


LONDON BOMBINGS

"There is a stillness between the flash of an explosion and the moment the blast hits you. Yesterday morning the stillness filled London with surreal movements of normality in a far from normal situation.

Those nowhere near any of the blasts knew that something had happened. Tube stations were suddenly closed. Buses passed without stopping, their seats completely empty. The sound of emergency vehicle sirens told you they were needed elsewhere.

The surreal character of the moment was that human streams of displaced travelers steadily made their own journeys into Central London ; a refusal by civil society to allow terrorism to defeat them.

Acts of terrorism are always cowardly. They are military attacks on the innocent, drawing no distinction between young and old, black and white, Muslim, Jew, and Christian. Such arbitrary and gratuitous bombing is no more acceptable in London than in Baghdad , Fallujah or Mo sul . This is what we have to reflect on in the days to come.

The most immediate temptation to resist is that of the knee-jerk reaction. There is no case for the rushing through of emergency anti-terrorist laws, or of draconian restrictions on our liberties.

The best way to defend the open society is to live in open democratic ways. We defeat fundamentalist hatreds by demonstrating our solidarity with those of different faiths. We best confront al Qaida by refusing to become like them. But some messages cannot be ignored.

The antiwar movement consistently warned that the illegal war on Iraq would increase the terrorist threat to Britain rather than reduce it. We said too, that Britain 's continued military occupation of Iraq , and the arbitrary violence to Iraqi cities resisting the occupation, would soon find echoes within Britain .

Once Iraq was a no-go zone for al Qaida. Now it is their recruiting ground. Britain cannot insist on a determination to maintain the Bush administration's occupation of Iraq without making Britain part of the war zone. When the current UN mandate expires at the end of the year British troops must leave. The government cannot credibly claim a right to pursue this ongoing war in Iraq without recognising that its opponents will bring the same war onto British soil.

There will be voices who argue that these bombings make the case for compulsory ID cards and general police stop-and-search powers. The answer is the complete opposite. We have to assert our belief in freedoms by refusing to close them down.

Londoners may have felt that such bombings were bound to happen sooner rather than later. Most will know they are inextricably bound up in the open wound of Iraq . As we raise our voices in outrage against the brutality the bombing brings with it, we should reflect on how close this brings us to families (just like our own) who face the same horrors in Iraq .

he official war in Iraq has ended. The bombings have not. In looking for answers to the threat to citizens in the UK , we cannot pretend that Britain 's continuing role in Iraq is not a central part of the problem. After the Madrid bombings the same issue confronted the Spanish people. They chose to tackle the issue of the war, rather than to extend the boundaries of the battlefield. Britain has to find the courage to do the same."

back to top


IMMIGRATION & EMPLOYMENT
It is unfortunate that so much press coverage of Immigration and Employment issues generates so much heat and so little light.   

Those arguing that migrants are stealing British jobs should look at evidence just presented to the House of Lords on this matter. Here are the facts:-

The proportion of the UK born population that is in work has remained static (at 75%) throughout the whole of the last 10 years.  Last year the actual numbers of UK born people in work dropped 230,000. This is because last year 272,000 UK born people dropped out of the workforce because they reached retirement age or migrated.

The harsh reality is that more of us are getting older and there are fewer UK born workers coming into the labour market.

What the House of Lords were told was that if Britain had a ‘zero net’ migration policy then those in work would have to pay higher taxes to support them in retirement.  By 2015 it would require an extra 1.4p in the pound on income tax and by 2036 it would require a 9p tax increase.  This is simply to maintain the balance between income from those in work and the cost of supporting those who have retired or who are children.  The alternative would be to increase the retirement age so that all of us work (and pay taxes) for longer.

There is an argument to be faced about how a society that lives longer should best pay for increases in the non-working years we hope to enjoy.  This is an issue that is biological more than it is political.  What we should not do is blame the process on migrant workers.  If anything, they are the ones paying taxes now for retirement benefits they are unlikely to enjoy.

back to top


WORKPLACE PARKING LEVY
It may well be that the most equitable way of addressing the taxation of vehicle use in Cities is through an increase in fuel duties.  The difference in this is that any revenues raised would go first to the Treasury.  It would not allow Cities to raise money that could go into other local transport alternatives.

As a car user, I know that the future has to be built around far more substantial public transport networks than we have now.  I know that my own use of the car will have to come a poor second to the establishment of these networks.  It may well be they also come a poor second to the development of cycle networks.  This is the pattern of what already is developing in a number of other European Cities and is something we are going to have to catch up with in Britain.

It is legitimate to complain that there is an unfairness about introducing workplace charges when the alternative public transport infrastructure is not in pace. Unfortunately we are caught between a rock and a hard place.  There is no way of raising the resources for these infrastructures unless councils are able to raise additional monies in some variation of either the workplace parking levy or congestion charging.  These seem to be the realistic choices that Nottingham has to address.

back to top


PARLIAMENT
'Should be valued for its imperfections as much as its achievement. Its struggle to hold government to account is what gives government itself credibility. Any government that overlooks the fragile contract it has been given by the electorate, and hands increasing authority to unelected corporations and anti-democratic bodies, will find that the public will sooner or later redefine democracy in more accountable terms'.

back to top


PENSION PROVISION
I also agree with you completely about pension provision. I have argued for a long time that the best way of avoiding confusion and bureaucracy is to restore the value of the state pension and reconnecting it to rises in earnings. It is a point regularly made by the National Pensioners Convention, with whom I campaign on this issue. I enclose a copy of an article I have written on this in the hope that it is of some interest.

I have been actively involved in discussions with public sector trade unions about the far reaching implications that this would have. I am not convinced that there is a pension's crisis that warrants the changes being pushed through. I remind colleagues that 250 billion pounds was lost from the value of UK pension funds when the dot.com market crashed. In recent years Fund managers have been allowed to put pension contributions into speculative activities, treating them more like a casino that a serious investment plan. We are now asking pension scheme members to make good the cost of this speculation, either by paying more or working longer.

The starting point for my discussion with Ministers is that if they want to change pension arrangements then workers who contribute into these funds must first have the right to control what is done with them. My worry is that by pushing the changes through as they are, the government is preparing the ground not just for higher contributions from yourselves, but also to make it easier to sell public sector jobs to private providers. In the United States they are already talking about privatising public pension schemes. We should be wary indeed about taking any steps in a similar direction.

I have already offered to campaign alongside public sector trade unions on this issue, on both a local and national level. I look forward to doing so alongside you.

back to top


PLANNING WHITE PAPER
I also have serious reservations about this.  I am in favour of deregulation as long as local authorities have the power to set down standards and requirements that they feel are appropriate to their area.  Any revision of planning law that just transfers power to developers simply misses the point.  It is something I would oppose, and intend to do so.

back to top


POLICE
Nottinghamshire has added 319 officers to the police force since the Chief Constable took office in June 2000. There are also an extra 257 civilian staff to reduce the paperwork burden. Nottingham faces two big difficulties. The first is the growth in serious crime. The second is standards of performance. There is a real issue about gun and drug crime. I have made this point to eh Home Secretary, asking for national resources to help address the problem that maybe in Nottingham today, but could just as easily move to Derby or Leicester tomorrow. The extra help given to Nottinghamshire by the Home Office now is to specifically tackle this problem.

back to top


SEXUAL ORIENTATIONS
My own view is that faith is a personal matter, but one which should in general be treated respectfully.  This does not however, extend into spheres where the nature of those beliefs would seek to discriminate against others in society who pose neither risk nor threat to them.  Those who would accord women fewer rights than men, on the basis of religious beliefs of cultures are just living in the wrong society.

For many years Christian churches in South Africa used their own variety of religious beliefs to justify the apartheid system.  In Israel today it is used to justify different treatment between Jews and non-Jews.  In the Asian sub-continent the same approach to religiosity can be used to justify discriminatory practices between Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and Christians.  Does this make any of the discrimination that follows right?  No.

The absence of sexual orientation legislation has not prevented any of the major sex abuse scandals that have rocked the churches.  I suspect what this legislation will do is to force churches to have a more open debate, that they should have been having a long time ago; namely the distinction between a different sexual orientation and the practices of sexual abuse. The distinction I find myself increasingly drawing is between those who live in gentle non exploitative relationships and those who live in more combative and exploitative ones.  I just think it is helpful to spell out to constituents that this is where I stand.

back to top


THE SINGLE CURRENCY
'Stands in the way of almost every important issue Europe should be discussing. There is no public support for centralised European taxation and European wealth redistribution. The 'euro' will turn out to be neither stable nor unifying. It will turn us into a continent of thieves - eager to steal the best slice for ourselves and share as little as possible with others. In Britain, it isn't that the government can't sell the case for the Euro - they couldn't give it away'.

back to top


SMOKING BAN
Any decision about whether to make Nottingham a no smoking City would be the prerogative of the City Council rather than Parliament. When asked about this I have simply made it clear that I would support the City Council should they make such a decision. One of our main challenges is to stop the growth of smoking among women, which is far faster-growing than among men.

It is important to recognise any such decision about smoking in public places and it does not extend to decisions people make about their own lives and in their own homes. As such it is not a breach of individual human rights because individuals still have the right to smoke. It is just that we would restrict the health damage on other people who are non smokers. In many ways this is similar to the way society approaches other forms of pollution and contamination. We know there are all sorts of noxious substances produced from industry or even in the home. Over the years society has simply produced rules about the containment of such substances and their disposal.

Cities that have decided to do the same in respect of smoking are merely applying the same logic to the cancer causing problems associated with inhalation of tobacco fumes. This is why I haven't called for a ban on tobacco or would consider the current proposals to be a violation of common rights.

back to top


SOCIALISM
'It is so long since anyone made the case for socialism that people have forgotten their arguments against it'.

back to top


EUROPEAN UNION
The position I take on this is that I am deeply sceptical of the free market obsessions that underpin EU policies. These and the bureaucracy surrounding them seem to completely disregard the challenges that Climate change will confront us with. I am not against European initiatives aimed at delivering water security, energy security, or the renewal of local food systems. My objection is just that the current policies of the EU seem to disregard these.

back to top


THE NHS
The NHS is the most civilising gift of my lifetime. It is the difference between society and a market place. I will be opposing all moves to sell it off.

back to top


THE WORLD TRADE ORGANISATION
'Sucks. It sucks wealth from national economies into cyber corporations, takes democracy away from citizens and hands it to shareholders, and its only interest in environmental and social rights is that there shouldn't be any (or at least none that are legally binding or interference with trade)'.

back to top


THE THIRD WAY
'An intellectual scam. It is little more than a cover for when governments lose the courage to govern; when they decide that managing the economy is too difficult, so hey will manage the people instead. It will all end in tears'.

back to top


CAMPAIGN TO REDUCE THE VOTING AGE TO 16
Over the centuries people have fought for the right of universal suffrage. For me, this means that if you are old enough to fight for your country and old enough to pay taxes to run it, you should be able to vote on who you want to decide on both taxes and war. It probably means equalising the full range of adult responsibilities before the courts, but at least this would bring a degree of consistency to the system that is often sadly lacking.

back to top